By: Yogda Kakirde
Student, X Semester, B.A.LL.B (Hons.), Department of Law, Prestige
Institute of Management and Research, Indore
Social media has
become an integral part of our everyday lives, whether it is communication,
interaction, information, business, promotions or anything it’s the primary
medium to indulge in any kind of public discourse. Since there has been a rise in the usage of Internet Communities there
is a huge challenge to create content moderation and to strike a balance
between freedom of speech and hate speeches. It’s the need of the hour to set some uniform
standards of control in order to prevent negative setup of misinformation, hate
speech, defamation etc.
Social Media
platforms in India enjoys ‘Intermediary Protection’
from liability. The basic meaning of intermediary includes anyone or anything
that facilitates transaction or interaction between two or more parties by
bridging the gap between the two. In legal terms, the definition of
intermediary is provided under section 2(w) of the Information
Technology Act 2000 as “any person who, on behalf of another person, receives, stores, or
transmits that record or provides any service with respect to that record,
which includes telecom service providers, network service providers, internet
service providers, web-hosting service providers, search engines, online
payment sites, online-auction sites, online-marketplaces, and cyber cafes.” The
concept of Significant Social Media Intermediaries was introduced in The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines
and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 were released in the year 2021. Rule 2(1)(w) of the IT Rules 2021 define a “social media
intermediary” as “an intermediary which primarily or solely enables online
interaction between two or more users and allows them to create, upload, share,
disseminate, modify or access information using its services.” They enable smooth
communication across the globe. Few examples of Intermediaries being Twitter,
Netflix, Instagram etc. In India, the criteria of being called as social
media intermediary is having more than 50, 00,000 registered users. These intermediaries need to
comply with the mandate of additional due diligence requirements.
The safe harbour
provision under section 79 of the IT Act 2000,
these Intermediaries enjoys protection from legal liability for any criminal
action of a third party which is done without any knowledge of the intermediary
as long as they comply with few mandates. Section 79 provides immunity
clause which states that an intermediary will not be liable for third party
information, data, links hosted on its platform. However, this immunity has its
own condition to comply with such as adopting statutory due diligence or enforcing
‘notice and take down’ procedures. Also, an intermediary shall be liable if
remove or disable access to illegal content upon receiving notice from
appropriate authorities.
According to Information and Technology Rules 2021 Intermediaries are require to:
· Appoint a Chief Compliance Officer, Nodal Contact Officer,
Resident Grievance Officer
· Publication of monthly reports which contains number of complaints
received and subsequent action taken in regard of complaints raised.
·
These social media intermediaries are also instructed 2 comply
with grievance redressal mechanism so that if any content put on these
platforms is opposed to public policy the complaint for same can be registered
with the Officer the acknowledgement of such complaints shall be within the
span of 24 hours and a resolution shall be provided within 15 days.
·
These intermediaries also need to provide the identifications
related to first originator of information.
No comments:
Post a Comment